Organisation of respiratory rehabilitation in post-COVID-19 patients with sequelae. Evaluation and therapeutic indication for remote rehabilitation vs. conventional rehabilitation. FRESH-PEF73830-en Organisation of respiratory rehabilitation in post-COVID-19 patients with sequelae. Evaluation and therapeutic indication for remote rehabilitation vs. conventional rehabilitation. REHABCOVID FRESH-PEF73830-en 73830 FRESH-PEF73830 Jean-Marc VALLIER CENTRE HOSPITALIER INTERCOMMUNAL TOULON / LA SEYNE-SUR-MER Epidemiology France Portal (PEF) null Jean-Marc;VALLIER Pulmonary medicine Diseases of the respiratory system COVID-19 Compare the efficacy of two respiratory rehabilitation methods on patient physical capacity: a 4-week remote respiratory rehabilitation (RRR) programme vs. a conventional respiratory rehabilitation (RR) programme, for reducing sequelae present in post-COVID-19 patients. null France Provence - Alpes - Côte d\'Azur Individuals Patients population Male Female Young Adult (19 to 24 years) Adult (25 to 44 years) Middle Aged (45 to 64 years) Aged (65 to 79 years) Aged, 80 and over (80 years and more) 1. Subjects aged over 18 years. 2. Subjects having contracted COVID-19 determined by a positive RT-PCR test and/or presence of antibodies. 3. Subjects having received a medical prescription for respiratory rehabilitation. 4. Subjects equipped with the necessary computer equipment and network coverage for videoconferencing. 5. Subjects with at least one of the following post-COVID-19 sequelae: - Dyspnoea at rest or on exertion measured using the mMRC (modified Medical Research Council) scale, with a score greater than or equal to 2. (Vestbo et al., 2013) - Hyperventilation measured using the Nijmegen questionnaire, with a score greater than or equal to 23/64 (Van Dixhoorn and Duivenvoorden, 1985; Sauty and Prosper, 2008) - Exercise intolerance measured using the 1 min-STS (1-minute sit-to-stand test) according to the standards based on age and gender, established by Strassmann et al. (2013). - Abnormal fatigue measured using the MFI-20 (Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory), French-language version validated by Gentile et al. (2003) according to the standards based on age and gender, established by Schwarz et al. (2003). - Anxiety and depression status measured using the HADS (Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale), French-language version validated by Roberge et al. (2013) according to the standards based on age and gender, established by Bocéréan and Ducret (2014) 6. Registered with or a beneficiary of a social security scheme. Clinical data Participant-reported health data Other < 500 individuals Converting or copying information into a structured record Interview with the participant (including clinical) Observational Study Observational Study 118 subjects (59 patients in the RR group and 59 patients in the RRR group) Unknown To be defined